<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open letter to spammers&#8211;nobody likes you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/04/23/open-letter-to-spammers-nobody-likes-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/04/23/open-letter-to-spammers-nobody-likes-you/</link>
	<description>Web Standards, Web Culture, Web Everything.™</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Akismet how I love thee &#124; ara pehlivanian&#8212;Web Standards, Web Culture, Web Everything.&#8482;</title>
		<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/04/23/open-letter-to-spammers-nobody-likes-you/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Akismet how I love thee &#124; ara pehlivanian&#8212;Web Standards, Web Culture, Web Everything.&#8482;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 13:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/04/23/open-letter-to-spammers-nobody-likes-you/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in December of &#8216;05 Molly wrote Best. Spam. Ever. at which time I was lucky enough not to have the problem of comment spam. Fast forward to about a month ago and suddenly my post and suddenly my post Proper URI design started to gain the attention not of fellow web-heads, but of spammer-freaks. Who knows, it could have been my immensely popular post on Coming soon to a theatre near you&#8211;I confess, I dugg my own post&#8211;that opened me up to the non-web-head crowd. Either way, the comment spam began to flow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in December of &#8216;05 Molly wrote Best. Spam. Ever. at which time I was lucky enough not to have the problem of comment spam. Fast forward to about a month ago and suddenly my post and suddenly my post Proper URI design started to gain the attention not of fellow web-heads, but of spammer-freaks. Who knows, it could have been my immensely popular post on Coming soon to a theatre near you&#8211;I confess, I dugg my own post&#8211;that opened me up to the non-web-head crowd. Either way, the comment spam began to flow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ara</title>
		<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/04/23/open-letter-to-spammers-nobody-likes-you/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Ara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/04/23/open-letter-to-spammers-nobody-likes-you/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ian&lt;/strong&gt;: Hey cool, I didn&#8217;t know that MS had that. The motivation for this post was actually because I&#8217;ve been getting hit with a bunch of comment spam lately. I decided to give &lt;a href="http://akismet.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Akismet&lt;/a&gt; a try and I&#8217;ve got to say it works like a charm! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ian</strong>: Hey cool, I didn&#8217;t know that MS had that. The motivation for this post was actually because I&#8217;ve been getting hit with a bunch of comment spam lately. I decided to give <a href="http://akismet.com/" rel="nofollow">Akismet</a> a try and I&#8217;ve got to say it works like a charm! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Muir</title>
		<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/04/23/open-letter-to-spammers-nobody-likes-you/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/04/23/open-letter-to-spammers-nobody-likes-you/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>This is actually one thing that I think Microsoft had a good idea for. Create e-mail servers that pause for .5 seconds between each e-mail sent from an account. This .5 second delay wouldn&#8217;t affect most people, even my company&#8217;s newsletter would only take about 3 hours to process. But for a spammer who sends out 2.5 million e-mails this would be crippling.
If it takes a week to send out spam, then the 2% conversion rate is no longer profitable.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually one thing that I think Microsoft had a good idea for. Create e-mail servers that pause for .5 seconds between each e-mail sent from an account. This .5 second delay wouldn&#8217;t affect most people, even my company&#8217;s newsletter would only take about 3 hours to process. But for a spammer who sends out 2.5 million e-mails this would be crippling.<br />
If it takes a week to send out spam, then the 2% conversion rate is no longer profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
