<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When it&#8217;s okay to use &#8216;blink&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use-blink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use-blink/</link>
	<description>Web Standards, Web Culture, Web Everything.™</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ara</title>
		<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use-blink/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Ara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use/#comment-505</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WD&lt;/strong&gt;: Heh, sounds to me like the W3C was riding the fence. Keeping all camps happy :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WD</strong>: Heh, sounds to me like the W3C was riding the fence. Keeping all camps happy :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WD Milner</title>
		<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use-blink/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>WD Milner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use/#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Ara: Soorry, I may have worded that confusingly. Blink is in the CSS specification as a valid option for text-decoration. It is not, however, required that a browser support 'blink' in order to be considered CSS compliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ara: Soorry, I may have worded that confusingly. Blink is in the CSS specification as a valid option for text-decoration. It is not, however, required that a browser support &#8216;blink&#8217; in order to be considered CSS compliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ara</title>
		<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use-blink/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Ara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WD&lt;/strong&gt;: Didn't know that. By "not required" do you mean "is optional" or "is not in the spec at all"?

&lt;strong&gt;Alan&lt;/strong&gt;: What makes it better is that it's the Doctor Who site! Albeit the Canadian one... now if they could only update it and post the date/time of the first episode of the (hopefully) upcoming season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WD</strong>: Didn&#8217;t know that. By &#8220;not required&#8221; do you mean &#8220;is optional&#8221; or &#8220;is not in the spec at all&#8221;?</p>
<p><strong>Alan</strong>: What makes it better is that it&#8217;s the Doctor Who site! Albeit the Canadian one&#8230; now if they could only update it and post the date/time of the first episode of the (hopefully) upcoming season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use-blink/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use/#comment-438</guid>
		<description>haha... nice find!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha&#8230; nice find!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WD Milner</title>
		<link>http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use-blink/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>WD Milner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 20:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arapehlivanian.com/2006/05/30/when-its-okay-to-use/#comment-434</guid>
		<description>The 'blink' value for text-decoration is not required by the CSS specification to be supported by a conforming user agent. Its use may also prevent compliance with WAI accessibility guidelines.

Nonetheless I have to agree that this is one of the very few times I have seen blink used appropriately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;blink&#8217; value for text-decoration is not required by the CSS specification to be supported by a conforming user agent. Its use may also prevent compliance with WAI accessibility guidelines.</p>
<p>Nonetheless I have to agree that this is one of the very few times I have seen blink used appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
