Eighty comment challenge
According to my Feedburner button (at the bottom of the page) arapehlivanian.com gets roughly 85 regular readers. Of course this means that 85 people have put the feed in their reader and their reader pings my feed around once a day.
So here’s the challenge. Prove the stat right and leave a comment. It doesn’t have to have much (or anything) in it. I’m just curious to see if we can get at least 80 of the 85 to chime in!
Sphere: Related ContentBuy my book
The Art & Science of JavaScript
Advertisement
Advertisement
14 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
January 12th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
Hi.
January 12th, 2007 at 2:42 pm
The original story included an image at this point.
The original story included an image at this point.
The original story included an image at this point.
The original story included an image at this point.
The original story included an image at this point.
The original story included an image at this point.
talkr :)
January 12th, 2007 at 3:38 pm
I’m here! :-)
By the way, the UI for your comment is so unused that it’s not tested… ;-) On IE7, there’s many overlap of the text…
January 12th, 2007 at 6:31 pm
RSS reader here. Hello hello. And Ara, technically you shouldn’t be commenting until you hit 80, because you will artificially inflate the count!
January 12th, 2007 at 6:47 pm
Sarven: Don’t blame me, it’s talkr who won’t filter out Feedburner’s images that get tacked on to the end of the post.
And that does it for my comment in the challenge (yes I subscribe to my own feed!)
Nathan: Well, I could also just keep editing this comment if I want to reply to someone :-) And like I mentioned before, I subscribe to my own feed so one comment from me won’t inflate the count, if anything it’ll make it more accurate! :-)
January 12th, 2007 at 8:03 pm
Reporting for duty…
January 12th, 2007 at 8:40 pm
Ding dong
January 12th, 2007 at 10:36 pm
Seven comments down, only 78 more to go. :)
January 14th, 2007 at 8:55 am
Did someone say roll call?
January 15th, 2007 at 2:55 pm
This is not from FeedBurner nor NetNewsWire but Roger’s site. I guess Nathan and me have skewed things.
January 17th, 2007 at 4:34 am
10.
January 18th, 2007 at 10:24 am
February 6th, 2007 at 11:26 pm
Ping? Pong!
February 18th, 2007 at 11:43 pm
Fourteenth.