Posts Tagged ‘social’

The Future Of Social Media Is Geolocation

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

Why is Facebook so popular? Is it because people love Ajax or the colour blue? No, Facebook is popular because it serves a real-world social need, it connects people. It’s the same reason why Twitter is so popular, because it facilitates communication. These are the pillars of the social web, connection and communication. People doing online what people have been doing in the real world since the dawn of humankind, interacting with each other.

So now that people can connect with each other, broadcast their thoughts in 140 characters or less, and share video of themselves doing the Funky Chicken, what’s next?

Geolocation. If you think of computers, and by extension the web, as a means to an end rather than the end itself, then the next step in the evolution of the social media phenomenon is to translate the connections in the digital world into connections in the physical world. This is where geolocation comes into play.

For example, I’m certain that soon all cameras will tag images with GPS coordinates so that once they’re shared, people will be able to know where they were taken. This will help people more easily find pictures of known locations as well as better relate to the experience the photographer is sharing. Another example of connecting people in the real world is Nine Inch Nails‘ upcoming iPhone App. The app leverages the iPhone’s GPS ability to connect fans in many different ways (watch Kevin Rose explain about half way through this Wired.com video).

The point, like I mentioned earlier, is that social media is a means to an end and not the end itself. If you want to be ahead of the curve then focus on developing tools that will bring people closer together. Build tools that will help people discover and connect in new and different ways. Build tools that will help them translate those connections into the real world we all live in. Because in the end, that’s what social media is really all about.

What’s your Twitter ratio?

Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

It always bothers me when I get a Twitter notification telling me that someone is following me only to find that they’re following 17,000 people. It’s always seemed insincere to me. I’ve also noticed that some people have tons of followers who follow very few people themselves. I feel that these numbers speak a lot about the people to whom they belong, which is how I came up with what I call the Twitter ratio.

It’s simple, take someone’s “followers” number and divide it by their “following” number. What you end up with is that persons Twitter ratio. So for example, at the time of this writing I have 120 followers and I’m following 124 people. That gives me a ratio of 0.97. Now take the person who is following 17,000 people but only has say, 2,000 followers, they’d have a ratio of 0.12. On the other hand, someone who is following only 100 people but who himself has 2,500 followers would have a ratio of 25.

The question is how to interpret these numbers. My initial take on this is, if you’ve got a really low ratio then to me you come off as a spammer. A really high ratio makes you a twittersnob. But if your ratio hovers at around the one to three mark, then you aren’t spamming and you aren’t a snob.

Am I interpreting these numbers incorrectly? What’s your take?