Posts Tagged ‘twitter’

Why Twitter Still Exists

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

With Twitter suffering chronic down time, people are beginning to openly consider alternatives. Yet Twitter’s user base is far from waning. Which raises a legitimate question, “how come everyone is still on Twitter when there are better alternatives available?”

The answer in my opinion, is a simple one: everyone is on Twitter. Think about it, what if you switch to Jaiku or Pownce? You’ll end up talking to yourself and missing out on all the action. Why? Because everyone is on Twitter.

In order for Twitter to suffer any loss, one thing will have to happen: several big names will have to simultaneously defect to a rival service which will likely trigger a mass exodus. Otherwise, limping or not, Twitter is here to stay.

Update: This kind of transparency and honesty is another reason why Twitter still exists. Good job on the communication front guys.

What’s your Twitter ratio?

Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

It always bothers me when I get a Twitter notification telling me that someone is following me only to find that they’re following 17,000 people. It’s always seemed insincere to me. I’ve also noticed that some people have tons of followers who follow very few people themselves. I feel that these numbers speak a lot about the people to whom they belong, which is how I came up with what I call the Twitter ratio.

It’s simple, take someone’s “followers” number and divide it by their “following” number. What you end up with is that persons Twitter ratio. So for example, at the time of this writing I have 120 followers and I’m following 124 people. That gives me a ratio of 0.97. Now take the person who is following 17,000 people but only has say, 2,000 followers, they’d have a ratio of 0.12. On the other hand, someone who is following only 100 people but who himself has 2,500 followers would have a ratio of 25.

The question is how to interpret these numbers. My initial take on this is, if you’ve got a really low ratio then to me you come off as a spammer. A really high ratio makes you a twittersnob. But if your ratio hovers at around the one to three mark, then you aren’t spamming and you aren’t a snob.

Am I interpreting these numbers incorrectly? What’s your take?